Latin American Key Correspondent Team

The Spanish Key Correspondent team is a group of community-based chroniclers who united together to tell the world about a march of events concerning HIV/AIDS. These citizen journalists share the march of events in their communities for the purpose of generating change and igniting the decision-makers.The Corresponsales’ mission is to provide information in discussion forums on health and development from a grassroot and on-site perspective using these means to promote empowerment and mobilisation of civil society.
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta CCMs. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta CCMs. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, 8 de febrero de 2010

Interview with Lelio Marmora, head of Global Fund LAC

The Head of the Global Fund’s Regional Team for Latin America and the Caribbean carried out an evaluation of the meeting held in Asunción and weighed the panorama for the region with an outlook for next year.

What is your evaluation of this meeting and what do you think its short-term results will be?

"I think that it left us with a quite positive result because it is the first time that we have held a meeting that dealt with specific cross-cutting topics of the Country Coordinating Mechanisms (CCMs). It discussed extremely important topics such as the question of funding the CCMs, defining the supervision role of the CCMs in a very concise manner, the positioning of the private sector and what are the possibilities of increasing its participation.

"All of these are tactical topics. A tactic, which is circumstantial and a very specific action, is not the only important issue. Strategy is important as well. We must not confuse tactics with a strategy and it is a mistake which we are all tempted to make: the CCMs, the Secretariat of the Global Fund, the Board of Directors and the agencies."

And what would be the strategic topics to take into consideration?

"In strategic terms, I think that there are two very clear issues: The first is that you cannot build a coordinating mechanism, whether at a country or regional level, which is not based on the consensus. We will tirelessly repeat that one has to get out of the mode of conflict dynamics in order to go into a consensus dynamics. Intelligent, respectful consensus without imposing other points of view.

"A negotiation consensus but not a negotiation in which one sector reaps all the benefits because that is not negotiation either. The second strategic point is the positioning of Latin America versus the real world which is undeniable."

In terms of this point, how would you evaluate the region on a short-term basis?

"I think the coming year is going to be a critical year. I don't know if there will be enough time to prepare a strong positioning strategy at the moment, but Latin America can indeed be a protagonist in the discussion and deserves a leading role. However, to play a leading role there has to be a policy agenda that involves several key elements.

"We need to be innovative in what we propose to the international community. A region with an epidemic concentration like ours, with the level of income per capita that the countries have – despite the social inequalities – we have to be innovative."

And how could you be innovative?

"Innovative in the sense that we have to stop spending money and really invest it. Strong conceptual changes must be made in the way we conceive the projects going from the logic of the project to the logic of the programme. One cannot structure the response based on multiplying the fragmented projects where each one is on his own.

"Another element that seems to be critical from a policy agenda perspective is to continue utilising the ability of local technical assistance the way it is used in Round 9. I think it has been proven that Latin America can produce clear and concise proposals."

What are the exact recommendations when faced with this panorama?

Mainly to abandon the fragmented concept of permanent negotiation in the CCMs so that it can become an environment of constructive debate and not a setting where some policies are determined. Policy-making for the sake of policy-making is not very positive in this case.

"All the sectors have to reverse its way of interacting and try to imagine a scenario in which the national programme would be a State project and not a Government project or one sole sector project; it should be one sole project that contemplates the different variables of the distinct human groups of people."

Interview by Alejandra Ruffo and Mirta Ruiz
Key Correspondent Team – Asuncion, 11/12/09

Recommendations for multisectoral participation


Representatives from all over the region debated and drafted proposals to guarantee maximum participation and representation for all sectors in the CCMs.
The participants in the South American Regional Meeting of the Country Coordinating Mechanisms and the Regional Coordinating Mechanisms participated in an exercise in which a debate took place on the need for inclusion, participation and representation of all the sectors in the CCMs. The groups prepared proposals and action plans to achieve advances against these obstacles.

Selection of CCM members from the non-governmental sector

The CCM members acknowledged three common problems: A lack of rotation, a lack of representation and the existence of necessary but poorly organised sectors. To resolve these problems, they proposed to apply existing policies and they comply with the election process every two years and with only one mandate extension.

They also suggested that the balance between Civil Society and Government be maintained and that it works in response to the agendas of the sectors and not according to persons or institutions. Lastly, they recognised that s common effort needs to be made in order to guarantee the participation of the less-organised sectors with the support of international cooperation.

Roles and responsibilities of the different sectors in CCM operations

The participants concluded there was a need for capacity building in order to fulfil the roles of the participants. Hence, a greater commitment is needed from the members, the policy-making role of the CCM needs to be boosted and dialogue and advocacy needs to be put into writing in order to prepare national strategies.

They also considered it important to ensure that all sectors participate from the beginning of the proposal preparation and to avoid fragmentation.

Active representation by the CCM members of the interests of the sector they represent

In this last point, the participants identified three precise challenges: Capacity building, achieving effective communication and including baselines in the preparation of the proposals. In the presentation of their conclusions, the group stated that it is fundamental to “strengthen the capacities of each member so that they can effectively participate and represent their sectors”.

To achieve this, they suggested, amongst other action plans, preparing a Web page which includes all the information about the CCM.

The conclusions of all the teams demonstrated that the theory was clear. The problems are identified and there are effective proposals to resolve them. Now, all that remains is to put them into practice to see if they can successfully overcome the conflicts and the differences so that these ideas can truly come into fruition.

By Alejandra Ruffo
Key Correspondent Team – Asuncion, 9/12/09

Global Fund ED visits Paraguay


Michel Kazatchkine, Executive Director of the Global Fund, travelled to Paraguay to attend the regional meeting and sign a new agreement for €3.5 million in order to fund HIV/AIDS programmes.
Amongst many acknowledgements of gratitude and providing a balance of the Global Fund in the region, its Executive Director, Professor Michel Kazatchkine, participated in a round of questions and answers with the participants at the Regional Meeting.

Following the presentation he met with Paraguay’s Minster of Health, Esperanza Martinez, to sign a new agreement for €3.5 million that is designated to fund programmes for prevention, diagnosing and treatment of HIV/AIDS.

“We have seen an extraordinary change in terms of health world-wide. The key factor was understanding the unacceptable gaps between the North and South countries”, stated Kazatchkine at the beginning of his presentation, in which he gave an analysis of the panorama in the region related to HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria.

In his analysis he said that 2010 “will be an absolutely critical year” as in addition to presenting the new structure, it will be a year of transition in which the Global Fund will become an autonomous institution. In reference to these changes Kazatchkine assured that the CCMs will occupy a very important place in advocacy.

“Five of the eight Millennium Development Goals are directly or indirectly related to health”, he maintained and assured that currently the Global Fund "has become the most important global funder" in terms of health.

“The model is very attractive because of its pillars and you are the ones who implement your proposals”, he explained. Thus, he persistently asked the representatives from the CCMs to make a commitment to successfully achieve the goals. “Keep working, manifesting, expressing your needs and be an advocate. The Global Fund is making a difference and this saves lives. And the Global Fund is you”, he expressed.

In the signing of the agreement with Paraguay, Kazatchkine insisted on a request for greater commitment from the regional CCMs in order to successfully reach the millennium goals linked to health: “With this signing, I have no doubts that the millennium objectives will be achieved by Paraguay. And they must be achieved for all countries in all of Latin America because they have potential”.

By Alejandra Ruffo
Key Correspondents Team – Asuncion, 9/12/09

The challenges of multisectoral coordination


At the Regional CCM Meeting of the Global Fund, work groups were created to prepare a series of recommendations for the purpose of successfully meeting challenges that the CCMs are confronting. We present a few of them.
Conflict of interest
Conflict of Interest is defined as a conflict a CCM/RCM member must face when he has a personal or institutional interest resulting in a discussion or decision on this mechanism. For example, when the CCMs select the Principal Recipients and Sub-Recipients who implement the programmes or the supervision or the development of the programmes, amongst others.

The specific recommendations of the work group are to create an external ethics committee (selected and assigned by the CCM) or a mixed committee (with members also from this same mechanism).

In any coordinating mechanism or governing board, it is inevitable that at one time or another a conflict of interest will arise, however, this decision-making area must have active policies and concrete measures to resolve these conflicts.

It would be difficult in many of our countries to have a CCM without the membership of key organisations that are also potential Sub-Recipients. For this reason, it is fundamental to strive for practical solutions to these central ethical issues.
Harmonisation and Alignment

Since its creation, the Global Fund is an organisation that provides additional resources for national responses to the three diseases. However, in practice many Global Fund programmes become projects that are not aligned with the already existing programmes.

The group determined the need to leave rhetoric behind and move forward with implementation, thus the national response must be only one response and it must be multisectoral.

The Global Fund is now involved in the implementation of a new structure which includes, as a policy, that the countries may only request resources to fund National Strategies. This measure is, in some way, a reflection of the attempts at harmonisation that were not successful enough, not only in the countries but amongst the community of the donor countries.

The concerns of civil society are the validity and relevance of the National Strategic Programmes (those that require an in-depth review) and the participation of the NGOs, the most vulnerable populations and the communities in this new structure.

The Global Fund has existed for many years now and some countries in the region have been funded since the first round. However, there is still confusion and incertitude about the role of the CCMs accompanied by few practical responses to the challenges of communication and conflict of interest which, in many cases, cast a doubt on the legitimacy of these mechanisms.

Hopefully, this regional meeting whose focus is to strengthen the mechanisms, will be an opportunity to overcome some of these challenges and improve the effectiveness and efficacy of the resources that Global Fund invests.

By Alejandra Ruffo and Javier Hourcade Bellocq
Key Correspondents Team – Asuncion, 8/12/09

Principles of the CCMs: Advancements and challenges


Representatives of the Global Fund gave a presentation on the general concepts of the CCMs where they spoke about the achievements and the points that need to be improved upon in order to work more effectively.
In the second session of the Latin American Regional Meeting for the Country Coordinating Mechanisms and the Regional Coordinating Mechanisms, David Winters and Katherine Owen, from the CCM Team of the Secretariat, gave a presentation on the general concept and principles of these elements. Both of them were in agreement about one recommendation: “There must be more transparency in activities”.

“There is a need for greater transparency in the selection of the CCM members so that their representation will be more meaningful. People should represent sectors and not organisations”, affirmed Owen in his presentation. Along the same line, David Winters added: “Those closer to the problem need to be participating in the solution”.

During the session, the orators explained how the CCM works and gave actual statistics on its composition. Some populations, such as women and transgenders, have successfully obtained a greater presence, although statistics show that men represent the majority of the percentage and occupy more presidential posts.

“With our collective efforts and funding, resources are being mobilised, lives are being saved and the prevalence rate for AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria are decreasing. The challenge for our Board of Directors is that people are not presenting projects as opposed to national programmes", explained Winters.

For his part, Owens emphasised the importance of fulfilling the role of supervision: “If proper supervision is not carried out, an opportunity to find solutions, to improve the implementation of the proposals and to have effective Principal Recipients is lost”, he pointed out.

Finally, they mentioned the importance of not converting the CCMs into private closed groups: “Those who are not members should be invited. This is good for transparency so that the work we are doing can be seen. CCMs are not private, exclusive clubs or groups that make decisions for others", advised Williams.

“We have to leave our comfort zone where we are accustomed to working with members and certain areas of government. We need to broaden our horizons”, added Owen.

After the presentations, work groups were formed to analyse the role of the CCMs, the issues of Conflict of Interest, Harmonisation, Coordination and the work between the Secretariats. Further information on the basic structures of the Fund can be found here.

By Mirta Ruiz and Alejandra Ruffo
Key Correspondents Team – Asuncion, 8/12/09

LAC Regional Meeting of the Global Fund begins


Esperanza Martinez, Paraguay’s Minister of Health, and Lelio Marmora, Head of the Global Fund’s Regional Team for Latin America and the Caribbean, participated in the call to order of the meeting, which took place in Asuncion.
“Health policies cannot be made starting with guidelines given by a Minister. Permanent on-going interaction is necessary”, stated Paraguay’s Minister of Health, Esperanza Martinez, in the call to order of the Latin American Regional Meeting for the Country Coordinating Mechanisms and the Regional Coordinating Mechanisms. In addition, Lelio Marmora, Head of the Global Fund’s Regional Team of Latin America and the Caribbean, was in charge of the call to order.

Esperanza Martinez took the opportunity at the call to order to congratulate the Global Fund on implementing the Country Coordinating Mechanism in Latin American countries where they have already been operating for six years in the region. “We have six years of arduous work, lessons learned and political and technical maturity. We have learned by trial and error”, acknowledged Lelio Marmora.

“This meeting allows us to reassess in a favourable light international cooperation” affirmed the Minister of Health who is also the President of the CCM Paraguay. In turn, Marmora referred to the importance of organisation to fight against the current global economic crisis. “The international community is re-evaluating its investment in development, whether or not they should continue investing in AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria and whether or not they should continue investing at a multilateral level". In terms of this situation, she stated that Latin America is one of the regions that “suffers the most from this cutback”.


In the Meeting’s call to order the obstacles that must be overcome were also outlined in order to successfully achieve better performance by the CCMs. “We need strong systems, not strong people. Strong people who assume leadership are not sustainable”, maintained the representative of the Global Fund. And added: “Nowadays, the CCMs are an established reality and have earned their place. The day that we are no longer a part of the mechanism, the mechanism must continue functioning".


By Alejandra Ruffo
Key Correspondents Team – Asuncion, 8/12/09

The Corresponsales Clave Team in Asunción, Paraguay

Between 8 and 11 December, the City of Asunción in Paraguay hosted the Global Fund’s Regional Meeting of the Country Coordinating Mechanisms (CCMs) and the Regional Country Coordinating Mechanisms (RCMs) for the fight against AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. The objective of the meeting is to strengthen these governing mechanisms of the national framework that are key cornerstones in the proper functioning of Global Fund grants.

The Global Fund is an organisation that collects and distributes additional resources for the fight against AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria in developing countries. Since its creation in 2002, it has signed subventions for 16.1 million dollars in 140 countries. The Global Fund grants funding based on performance and up to the funded date, all requests that are technically sound with interventions based on evidence.

One of its most relevant characteristics is its governing structure that faithfully responds to the approach of public and private association, recreating venues where decisions are made between government, civil society (particularly the most affected populations), agencies of the United Nations System, educational institutions and the private sector. This structure exists within the national framework (CCMs) and within the regional framework with a regional subvention (RCMs) whilst the highest governing body of the Global Fund is the World Board.

This initiative promotes programmes that will be developed, implemented and monitored by the countries. It is the CCMs that approve requests and monitor their programmes so they will be successful. It is for this reason that there are no Global Fund employees whatsoever in any country. The Fund is only responsible for channelling resources. The technical aspects fall on the shoulders of the Global Fund partners and in particular the Agencies of the United Nation System as well as the World Health Organisation and UNAIDS. There are also other strategic partners in the central countries such as the German Government’s Backup Initiative (GTZ) and a countless number of NGOs and initiatives.

There is a wide gap between theory and actual experience so since the creation of the CCMs, this has been more than one cause for concern. There is a wide-range of challenges in the CCMs mainly related to participation, good government, transparency and conflict of interest, amongst others. This event’s purpose is to unblock some of these bottlenecks pursuing the result of the stronger CCMs.

Amongst the different values that the Global Fund put forward when it was established, the three fundamental pillars are: significant multisectoral participation, local appropriation and alignment with national programmes. To achieve this, there must be consolidated CCMs where dialogue flows and where each sector can bring the perspective of its representatives in order to achieve effective and efficient programmes that will save more lives.

This meeting will cover CCMs/RCMs in Latin America. In 2010, similar events will be held in Central America and in the Caribbean. For more information on the Global Fund, visit its website at: www.theglobalfund.org/es/

Through this Blog, we can share with you the topics and the voices that will be heard in Asuncion.

By Javier Hourcade Bellocq
Key Correspondent Team – Buenos Aires, 5/12/09